Submicroscopic deletions of the APC gene: a frequent cause of familial adenomatous polyposis that may be overlooked by conventional mutation scanning.

Kimberley J Flintoff1, Eamonn Sheridan2, Gwen Turner2, Carol E Chu2 and Graham R Taylor1,3.

1 Yorkshire Regional DNA Laboratory, Department of Clinical Genetics, St James’s University Teaching Hospital , Leeds, England

2 Department of Clinical Genetics, St James’s University Teaching Hospital, Leeds, England

3 Corresponding author

Keywords: familial adenomatous polyposis, adenomatous polyposis coli, quantitative PCR, dosage quotients

 

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant colon cancer predisposition syndrome in which patients develop hundreds to thousands of precancerous colonic polyps that have a high risk of becoming malignant.

Despite the fact that deletions of the APC locus were originally used to map [1][2], and identify [3][4] the APC gene most studies of mutations in APC have used techniques which would not detect deletions [5][6][7]. Molecular analysis of the APC gene in FAP patients has found the pathogenic mutation in 70% of cases [8], however a substantial minority have no mutation identified.

Interstitial deletions of chromosome 5q, which include the APC locus, have been reported in patients with polyposis coli and mental retardation [9]. Submicroscopic deletions have been reported in only a few cases [10][11]. In one family [10] linkage analysis with flanking and intragenic markers followed by in situ hybridisation with intragenic cosmid clones showed the deletion was approximately 200 kb and included more than the 3’ half of the APC gene and the 3’ adjacent D5S346 microsatellite. A recent report [11] described a quantitative PCR assay to detect submicroscopic deletions which included the entire APC gene and the adjacent D5S346 microsatellite in three unrelated Italian FAP families. These submicroscopic deletions do not appear to be associated with mental retardation.

Microsatellite analysis of families with FAP in our region showed one family with apparent non-maternity at D5S346 in one of the affected offspring of an affected mother, suggesting the possibility of an APC deletion. A quantitative PCR assay was therefore developed to detect submicroscopic deletions of the APC gene.

Previous analysis of 68 FAP families from the Yorkshire region has found the pathogenic mutation in 46 cases (67%). These cases were referred for testing (with informed consent) from the Yorkshire Regional Clinical Genetics Service after clinical examination and counselling. All families with an unidentified mutation have been analysed by quantitative PCR; deletions have been identified in 4 families which is about 5% of the Yorkshire FAP families. In family 1 we studied 3 individuals affected with FAP. Cytogenetic analysis on one of the patients showed a normal female karyotype. In family 2 we studied 4 individuals affected with FAP. One of these patients, the father of the other 3, did not develop the disease until he was 62 years old. In family 3 we studied 2 affected individuals. Only one sample was available from family 4. A patient with a cytogenetic deletion 46,XX,del(5),(q14.2q22.3) was also analysed by the quantitative PCR method.

Linkage analysis was performed using several flanking microsatellite markers: D5S299 [12], D5S82 [13], DS5122 [14], D5S346 [15], MCC [16] and D5S318 [17]. Products were analysed by GeneScan analysis on an ABI 373A DNA sequencer with 672 software.

The quantitative multiplex PCR contained amplimers for exons 8, 15A, 15D and 15F of APC [18] with exons 1, 2 and 3 of, MPZ (myelin protein zero) Yau, SC (pers comm) used as a control (table 1). The 5’ end of one primer from each pair was labelled with the fluorescent phosphoramidite 6-FAM. The reaction was carried out in a total volume of 10 ml and contained the following; 200 - 250 ng of template DNA, primers (table 2), 0.5 U of Promega Taq polymerase, 200 mM of each dNTP, 1.5mM MgCl2 in buffer (50 mM tris, 15 mM (NH4)2SO4, 50mM KCl, 0.085 mg/ml BSA). The reactions were performed in an MJ Research thermal cycler. Cycling parameters were as follows; 95oC for 5 minutes, 18 cycles of 95oC for 30 seconds 52oC for 30 seconds 70oC for 1 minute and a final extension at 72oC for 5 minutes. Products were analysed by GeneScan analysis on an ABI 373A DNA sequencer with 672 software. Figure 1 shows results from two of our families and a individual with normal dosage for APC. The amplification of the test sample was compared with the amplification of a control sample with a known point mutation in a different part of the APC gene. The peak height of each amplified exon was used to calculate dosage quotients as described previously [19] for all amplicons. For example the dosage quotient (DQ) for exon 8 of APC and exon 1 of MPZ: (sample APC exon 8 peak height/sample MPZ exon 1 peak height)/(control APC exon 8 peak height/control MPZ exon 1 peak height). Each APC exon was compared with each MPZ exon. A dosage quotient close to 1.0 indicated two copies of the test gene are present; a dosage quotient close to 0.5 indicated only one copy. Dosage quotients and standard deviations of the mean dosage quotients were calculated using duplicate test and control sample loadings.

Dosage quotient and standard deviation results are shown in table 3. The values were close to expected values with standard deviations approximately 10% of the mean dosage quotient. Two clear groups of results emerged with no overlap seen between values close to unity or values close to 0.5. Results indicating deletions (dosage quotients close to 0.5) were seen in each case with more than one amplicon, excluding allelic dropout as a cause of reduced amplification.

Three of the four deletions identified were distinct. Family 1 showed apparent non-maternity with marker D5S346 between the affected mother and one of her affected daughters. Quantitative PCR showed the affected individuals to have only one copy of exon 8, exon 15A, exon 15D and exon 15F of the APC gene and we concluded that the mutation in this family was a deletion which extended from at least exon 8 of APC to the 3’ D5S346 microsatellite. A similar deletion was identified in family 2. In this family all affected individuals were homozygous for the same MCC allele which suggests the deletion could include this locus. In family 3 the deletion extended from at least exon 8 to exon 15F of APC. Microsatellite analysis showed the proband to be heterozygous at D5S346 and D5S82. In family 4 dosage quotients for exon 8 of APC showed that there were two copies of this exon present but only one copy of the regions of exon 15 examined. The proband was heterozygous at D5S346. We concluded that the mutation in this family was a deletion which included exons 15A, 15D and 15F but did not extend as far as D5S346. A summary of the microsatellite data and quantitative PCR is shown in table 2.

Using a quantitative PCR assay we found submicroscopic gene deletions of APC to be the pathogenic mutation in four unrelated FAP families in Yorkshire, accounting for about 5% of our FAP families. Taken together with the report of [11] who found submicroscopic deletions in three Italian families with FAP (17% of their FAP pedigrees) these data suggest that submicroscopic deletions of the APC gene may be more common than is evident from the literature, perhaps because they would be undetected by conventional mutation scanning methods. For example, a recent study [7] found APC mutations in 106/190 FAP families but did not search for gene deletions. Our evidence suggests that gene deletions may be found in a substantial minority of FAP patients. That at least three of the four submicroscopic deletions were distinct, differing in the loss of D5S346 and exon 8, eliminates an undue bias in our sample due to a common founder mutation. As the assay is relatively quick and easy assay to perform it will now form part of our initial diagnostic mutation screen for a new FAP patient.

A number of quantitative methods have been described to measure gene dosage, including Southern blotting [20][21][22], oligonucleotide hybridisation , competitive PCR [23][24][25] and more recently Taqman assays [26] and comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) either using metaphase spreads [27] or arrayed targets [28]. Any useful dosage assay should meet criteria of specificity (absence of false positives), sensitivity (absence of false negatives), reproducibility and be reasonably economical in time and material. Hybridization assays using genomic DNA digests are somewhat more time consuming than PCR-based methods and usually involve the use of radiolabelled probes. CGH is a promising alternative, but limitations in the size of deletions or duplications detectable by metaphase spreads must be overcome by the availability of arrayed DNA before the technique can be generally applicable. Since automated fragment analysis is already widely used in genetic diagnostic laboratories, the use of dosage quotient analysis offers a robust and accessible means to test for microdeletions and duplications.

Pathogenic duplications or deletions have long been reported in the literature, from alpha globin [23] and dystrophin [29] to tumour suppressor genes including BRCA1 [30], BRCA2 [31] and hMSH2 [32]. It is therefore important that genetic testing includes the detection of altered gene dosage where appropriate as conventional mutation scanning methods may miss submicroscopic deletions.

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Yau, NE Thames Regional DNA Laboratory, Guy's hospital, London for providing primer sequences for STSs from the MPZ gene.

References

  1. Herrera L, Kakati S, Gibas L, Pietrzak E and Sandberg A A. Gardner syndrome in a man with an interstitial deletion of 5q. Am J Med Gen 1986;25:473-476.
  2. Bodmer W. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and its gene, APC. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1999;86:99-104.
  3. Joslyn G, Carlson M, Thliveris A, Albertson H, Gelbert L, Samowitz W, Groden J, Stevens J, Spirio L, Robertson M, Sargeant L, Krapcho K, Wolff E, Burt R, Hughes JP, Warrington J, McPherson J, Wasmuth J, Le Paslier D, Abderrahim H, Cohen D, Leppert M and White R. Identification of deletion mutations and 3 new genes at the familial polyposis locus. Cell 1991;66:601-613.
  4. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, Levy DB, Smith KJ, Preisinger AC, Hedge P, McKenchie D, Finniear R, Markham A, Groffen J, Boguski MS, Altschul SF, Horii A, Ando H, Miyoshi Y, Miki Y, Nishisho I and Nakamura Y. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science 1991;253:661-665.
  5. Cottrell S, Bicknell D, Kaklamanis L and Bodmer WF. Molecular analysis of APC mutations in familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic colon carcinomas. Lancet 1992;340:626-630.
  6. Nagase H and Nakamura Y.Mutations of the APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene. Human Mut 1993;2:425-434.
  7. Wallis YL, Morton DG, McKeown CM and Macdonald F. Molecular analysis of the APC gene in 205 families: extended genotype-phenotype correlations in FAP and evidence for the role of APC amino acid changes in colorectal cancer predisposition. J Med Genet 1999;36:14-20.
  8. Bodmer WF, Bailey CJ, Bodmer J, Bussey HJ, Ellis A, Gorman P, Lucibello FC, Murday VA, Rider SH, Scambler P, Sheer D, Solomon E and Spurr N. Localization of the gene for familial adenomatous polyposis on chromosome 5. Nature 1987;328:614-616.
  9. Pilarski RT, Brothman AR, Benn P and Rosengren SS. Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis in a man with an interstitial deletion of chromosome arm 5q. Am J Med Genet 1999;86:321-324.
  10. Mandl M, Caspari R, Jauch A, Boker T, Raschke H, Sengteller M, Propping P and Friedl W. Familial adenomatous polyposis: A submicroscopic deletion at the APC locus in a family with mentally normal patients. Hum Genet 1996;97:204-208.
  11. De Rosa M, Scarano MI, Panariello L, Carlomango N, Rossi GB, Tempesta A, Borgheresi P, Renda A and Izzo P. Three submicroscopic deletions at the APC locus and their rapid detection by quantitative-PCR analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 1999;7:695-703.
  12. van Leeuwen C, Tops C, Breukel C, van der Klift H, Fodde R and Khan PM. CA repeat polymorphism at the D5S299 locus linked to adenomatous polyposis-coli (APC). Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:5805.
  13. Breukel C, Tops C, Vanleeuwen C, van der Klift H, Fodde R and Khan PM. A CA repeat polymorphism at the D5S122 locus tightly linked to adenomatous polyposis-coli (APC). Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:6665.
  14. Breukel C, Tops C, van Leeuwen C, van der Klift H, Nakamura Y, Fodde R and Khan PM. CA repeat polymorphism at the D5S82 locus, proximal to adenomatous polyposis-coli (APC). Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:5804.
  15. Spirio L, Joslyn G, Nelson L, Leppert M and White R. A CA repeat 30-70 kb downstream from the adenomatous polyposis-coli (APC) Gene. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:6348.
  16. van Leeuwen C, Tops C, Breukel C, van der Klift H, Deaven L, Fodde R and Khan PM. CA repeat polymorphism within the MCC (Mutated in colorectal-cancer) Gene. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:5805.
  17. Wijnen J, Tops C, Breukel C, van Leeuwen C, Goverde A, van der Klift H, Fodde R and Khan PM. CA repeat polymorphism from YAC JW25 at the D5S318 locus, distal to adenomatous polyposis coli (APC). Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:6965.
  18. Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert, L, Albertson H, Joslyn G, Stvens J, Spirio L, Robertson M, Sargeant L, Krapcho K, Wolff E, Burt R, Hughes JP, Warrington J, McPherson J, Wasmuth J, Le Paslier D, Abderrahim H, Cohen D, Leppert M and White R. Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 1991;66:589-600.
  19. Yau SC, Bobrow M, Mathew CG and Abbs SJ. Accurate diagnosis of carriers of deletions and duplications in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy by fluorescent dosage analysis. J Med Genet 1996;33:550-558.
  20. Cutting GR, Antonarakis SE, Youssoufian H and Kazazian HH Jr. Accuracy and limitations of pulsed field gel electrophoresis in sizing partial deletions of the factor VIII gene. Molecular Biology & Medicine 1988;5:173-184.
  21. Chelly J, Marlhens F, Le Marec B, Jeanpierre M, Lambert M, Hamard G, Dutrillaux B and Kaplan JC. De novo DNA microdeletion in a girl with Turner syndrome and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Human Genet 1986;74:193-196.
  22. Mathew CG, Rousseau J, Rees JS and Harley EH. The molecular basis of alpha thalassaemia in a South African population. Br J Haematol 1983;55:103-111.
  23. Borriello F, Weinberg DS and Mutter GL. Evaluation of gene deletions by quantitative polymerase chain- reaction - experience with the alpha-thalassemia model. Diagn Mol Pathol 1994;3:246-254.
  24. Prior TW, Papp AC, Snyder PJ, Highsmith WE Jr, Friedman KJ, Perry TR, Silverman LM and Mendell JR. Determination of carrier status in duchenne and becker muscular- dystrophies by quantitative polymerase chain-reaction and allele- specific oligonucleotides. Clin Chem 1990;36:2113-2117.
  25. Young P, Stogbauer F, Wiebusch H, Lofgren A, Timmerman V, Van Broeckhoven C, Ringelstein EB, Assmann G and Funke H. PCR-based strategy for the diagnosis of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Neurology 1998;50:760-763.
  26. Laurendeau I, Bahuau M, Vodovar N, Larramendy C, Olivi M, Bieche I, Vidaud M and Vidaud D. TaqMan PCR-based gene dosage assay for predictive testing in individuals from a cancer family with INK4 locus haploinsufficiency. Clin Chem 1999;45:982-986.
  27. Perry A, Nobori T, Ru N, Anderl K, Borell TJ, Mohapatra G, Feuerstein BG, Jenkins RB and Carson DA. Detection of p16 gene deletions in gliomas: a comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) versus quantitative PCR. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1997;6:999-1008.
  28. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW and Albertson DG. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998;20:207-211.
  29. Tuffery S, Chambert S, Bareil C, Sarda P, Coubes C, Echenne B, Demaille J and Claustres M. Mutation analysis of the dystrophin gene in Southern French DMD or BMD families: from Southern blot to protein truncation test. Hum Genet 1998;102:334-342.
  30. Petrij-Bosch A, Peelen T, van Vliet M, van Eijk R, Olmer R, Drusedau M, Hogersvorst FB, Hageman S, Arts PJ, Ligtenberg MJ, Meijers-Heijboer H, Klijn JG, Vasen HF, Cornelisse CJ, Van’t Veer LJ, Bakker E, van Ommen GJ and Devilee P. BRCA1 genomic deletions are major founder mutations in Dutch breast cancer patients. Nat Genet 1997;17:341-345.
  31. Schmutzler RK, Bierhoff E, Werkhausen T, Fimmers R, Speiser P, Kubista E, Krebs D, Zeillinger R, Wiestler OD and von Deimling A. Genomic deletions in the BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 regions associate with low expression of the estrogen receptor in sporadic breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1997;74:322-325.
  32. Wijnen J, van der Klift H, Vasen H, Khan PM, Menko F, Tops C, Meijers Heijboer H, Lindhout D, Moller P and Fodde R. MSH2 genomic deletions are a frequent cause of HNPCC. Nat Genet 1998;20:326-328.

Legends

Figure legend

Figure 1 Electropherograms of quantitative PCR of exons 8 and 15 of APC and exons 1, 2 and 3 of MPZ. From left to right the peaks are exon 8 APC, exon 15A APC, exon 15D APC, exon 1 MPZ, exon 2 MPZ, exon 15F APC, exon 3 MPZ.

1a. Family 2 deleted for exons 8, 15A, 15D and 15F of APC and D5S346.

1b. Family 4 deleted for exons 15A, 15D and 15F.

1c. Normal (point mutation in APC identified).

Tables

Table 1 Primer sequences

Primer

Sequence

Ref

Product size (bp)

pmole per reaction

APC exon 8 for

ACC TAT AGT CTA AAT TAT ACC ATC

18

184

5

APC exon 8 rev

GTC ATG GCA TTA GTG ACC AG

18

 

5

APC exon 15A for

GTT ACT GCA TAC ACA TTG TGA C

18

371

2.5

APC exon 15A rev

GCT TTT TGT TTC CTA ACA TGA AG

18

 

2.5

APC exon 15D for

CTG CCC ATA CAC ATT CAA ACA C

18

382

2.5

APC exon 15D rev

TGT TTG GGT CTT GCC CAT CTT

18

 

2.5

APC exon 15F for

AAG CCT ACC AAT TAT AGT GAA CG

18

435

7.5

APC exon 15F rev

AGC TGA TGA CAA AGA TGA TAA TG

18

 

7.5

MPZ exon 1 for

CAG TGG ACA CAA AGC CCT CTG TGT A

Yau (pers. com.)

389

7.5

MPZ exon 1 rev

GAC ACC TGA GTC CCA AGA CTC CCA G

Yau (pers. com.)

 

7.5

MPZ exon 2 for

CTC ACT TCC TCT GTA TCC CTT ACT G

Yau (pers. com.)

393

10

MPZ exon 2 rev

GGA GGA CAA TGT AGT CAG GGT GAC A

Yau (pers. com.)

 

10

MPZ exon 3 for

TGA CAG CTG TGT TCT CAT TAG GGT C

Yau (pers. com.)

453

7.5

MPZ exon 3 rev

TCC GAG TGT ATG CCC TGC ATT GAG G

Yau (pers. com.)

 

7.5

Table 2 Summary of microsatellite and quantitative PCR results

 

D5S299

D5S82

D5S122

APC exon 8

APC exon 15A

APC exon 15D

APC exon 15F

D5S346

MCC

D5S318

Family 1

hom

het

hom

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

hom

het

het

Family 2

het

het

hom

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

hom

hom

het

Family 3

het

het

hom

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

het

het

het

Family 4

het

het

hom

2 copies

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

het

hom

het

cytogenetic deletion

hom

hom

hom

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

1 copy

het

hom

hom

Key: Hom - homozygous at locus, het - heterozygous at locus.

The order of the markers and exons is 5’ of APC to 3’ of APC.